Amazon.com.au:Customer reviews: Zero to One: Notes on Start Ups, or How to Build the Future
Skip to main content
.com.au
Hello Select your address
All
Select the department you want to search in
Hello, Sign in
Account & Lists
Returns & Orders
Cart
All
Best Sellers Customer Service Today's Deals Prime Fashion Music New Releases Kindle Books Books Electronics Home Toys & Games Gift Cards Computers Video Games Beauty Home Improvement Audible Health & Personal Care Sports, Fitness & Outdoors Pet Supplies Gift Ideas Automotive Coupons Subscribe & Save Sell
Createspace

  • Zero to One: Notes on Start Ups, or How to Build the Future
  • ›
  • Customer reviews

Customer reviews

4.5 out of 5 stars
4.5 out of 5
13,733 global ratings
5 star
68%
4 star
20%
3 star
7%
2 star
2%
1 star
2%
Zero to One: Notes on Start Ups, or How to Build the Future

Zero to One: Notes on Start Ups, or How to Build the Future

byPeter Thiel
Write a review
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
See All Buying Options

Top positive review

All positive reviews›
Steven Pell
5.0 out of 5 starsIf you like thinking about the future, you'll like this book.
Reviewed in Australia on 23 June 2017
I've read a lot of business books in 2017.

As I've read more and more books across business and tech, there's three criteria that I judge these books on. I know I'm going to love a book if it:
> Introduces me to new ideas
> Makes me question long held assumptions
> Balances big picture thinking with practical tactics
For me, this book delivers strongly on all three.

I don’t agree with all of Thiel’s opinions. But if you like thinking about the future you’ll probably like this book. 👍👍👍
Read more
6 people found this helpful

Top critical review

All critical reviews›
Amazon Customer
2.0 out of 5 starsCulture overwhelms strategy
Reviewed in Australia on 17 September 2018
It overlooks culture and is perhaps applicable only to the USA environment. I also think it sets a standard for success that is far too high for the great majority of start ups, that being 10x better than competitors. This excludes a vast number of successful start ups.
Read more
3 people found this helpful

Search
Sort by
Top reviews
Filter by
Verified purchase only
All stars
Text, image, video
Filtered by
Verified purchases, containing "improve"Clear filter
59 global reviews
This filter only shows ratings with reviews.

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

From other countries

J Staple
2.0 out of 5 stars Dissapointing
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 8 September 2016
Verified Purchase
Dissapointing and couldnt wait to get to the end. As per another review tbe best bit was the 7 questions a company should ask itself:
1. The engineering question- Can u create breakthrough tech instead of incremental improvements?
2. The timing question - is now the right time to start your business?
3. The Monopoly question - are you starting with a big share of a small market ?
4. The People Question - do you have the right team
5. The disruption question- do you have a way not just to create but to deliver your product?
6. The durability question - will your market be defensible 10/20 years into the future?
7. The Secret question - have you identified a unique opportunity that others do no see?
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
D T
1.0 out of 5 stars Tiny book of little use
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 17 December 2016
Verified Purchase
The book is easy to read, filled with somewhat strange anti competition drivel. As if evolutionary pressure on people and companies alike, does not yield improvements, from the need to survive. Throughout history, the greatest pressures from competition, have yielded the biggest change. Yes, competition can lead to tunnel vision on the other competitors, which may lead to fizzling out of companies or people from lack of innovation. But this is the nature of evolution, in business and of man.

An interesting take, but take from it what you will, just don't take it too seriously.
Report abuse
Sandeeep kaore
5.0 out of 5 stars Improve ur services
Reviewed in India on 22 October 2019
Verified Purchase
It's better
Report abuse
SANJAY BOGA
4.0 out of 5 stars Good startup book ever read
Reviewed in India on 30 January 2017
Verified Purchase
One of the best book ever read
Guys read this book . It might change and improve ur social skills...
Report abuse
Harish Nair
4.0 out of 5 stars this book (or better to say a compilation of notes) is about how ...
Reviewed in India on 24 June 2016
Verified Purchase
In the words of Peter, this book (or better to say a compilation of notes) is about how to build companies that create new things. Personally, I would say this book gives a good window into the mind of a great entrepreneur like Peter, which may give solace to other entrepreneurs with out of box idea and who are not getting support from near quarters. This is not a book which will detail out the steps in the journey, but it can tell you about what to expect in the journey. And nothing about the destination – that is for each to define as their own.

In the process, there are some gems I collected. Like the contra learnings from the dot com bust –
1. Make incremental advances
2. Stay lean and flexible
3. Improve on competition
4. Focus on product , not sale
OR what Peter professes
a) It is better to risk boldness than triviality
b) A bad plan is better than no plan
c) Competitive market destroys profits
d) Sales matter as much as the product
Which one to choose – all upto you.

Peter is unapologetic about monopoly – as he views that every business is successful exactly to the extent it does what others cannot, this making monopoly the condition for every successful business. All happy companies are those who have earned a monopoly by solving a unique problem, all failed companies are those who failed to escape competition

In order to get to the monopoly, Peter suggests to analyse the business within some parameters:
a) Proprietary technology – should be 10 times better than closest substitute
b) Network effects – an expanding network of users will bring in more users. A product is viral if its core functionality encourages users to invite their friends to become users too.
c) Economies of scale – the model should have a great potential to scale in its design
d) Branding – control the customer experience

Peter prefers to start small – target a small group of particular people concentrated together and served by few or no competitors. Dominate a small market than a large one. And then scale up.

Peter also serves some words of caution - some of which may not find universal resonance, like
a) Don’t Disrupt: focus on the act of creation. Disruptors often attract undue attention and take away substantial time
b) Last will be first : Moving first is a tactic, not a goal. Focus on cash flows. It may be better to be the last mover - to make the last great development in a specific market and enjoy years of monopoly profits
c) Full time involvement: Everyone you involve with your start up company should be involved full time – even remote working should be avoided to avoid any misalignment.
d) Do one thing : Make every person in the company responsible for doing just one thing
e) Human beings are irreplaceable: Complementarity between computers and human beings is the path to building a great business (e.g. LinkedIn helping recruiters than aiming to replace them)

Using the case of large scale failure of greentech companies, Peter lays out a set of seven questions that every business must answer:
1. The Engineering Question- Can you create breakthrough technology instead of incremental improvements?
2. The Timing Question- Is now the right time to start your particular business?
3. The Monopoly Question -Are you starting with a big share of a small market?
4. The People Question- Do you have the right team?
5. The Distribution Question- Do you have a way to not just create but deliver your product?
6. The Durability Question -Will your market position be defensible 10 and 20 years into the future?
7. The Secret Question - Have you identified a unique opportunity that others don’t see?

At the end, Peter addresses the question about the importance of founders. He agrees on the need to have and tolerate founders who seem strange and extreme. They are important as they can bring out the best work from everybody in the company. He also agrees that it can get dangerous when the founder is so certain of his myth that he loses his mind but he feels it is equally dangerous for a business to lose all sense of myth and mistake disenchantment for wisdom

There are many other areas on which Peter gives his views like control over future, the power law of venture capital, the case for having secrets etc. He focusses on finding singular ways to create new things that will make future not just different , but better – to go from zero to one, for which the essential step is to think for yourself. His closing comment “Only by seeing the world anew and as strange as it was to the ancients who saw it first, can we both re-create it and preserve it for the future”

The book is a recommended read as it is rare to get insights into some great minds. However, as I said in the beginning, don’t mistake this for a handbook for building a great business.
50 people found this helpful
Report abuse
AB
3.0 out of 5 stars Nice perspectives. Random Notes.Easy weekend read.
Reviewed in India on 18 March 2016
Verified Purchase
Is it possible to evaluate a Book without the conscious & unconscious bias, either positive or negative, you may have for the Author? When the book is on startups and the author a well known serial entrepreneur, its a difficult task to separate the two.
With Peter Thiel, founder of Paypal , Palantir and a serial investor, as the author, you would be fair to expect a glimpse of his learnings and wisdom in this book. The book itself is a compilation of lectures he had given at Stanford in 2012 and based on the notes taken by a student (and coauthor of this book, Blake Masters). Personally I am fond of such books. These give an opportunity to broaden your point of view the easy way while the author would have learned the same lessons the hard way, over years of iterations of what works.
The book Cover mentions ‘Notes on Startups or How to build the future’. I read this book as ’Notes’ and suggest the reader do the same. Moment you start seeing this as ‘How to’ book, you would start expecting a deeper corroboration of various philosophies, management ideas and processes. The book has its share of contrarian ideas, philosophical articulations with somewhat weak narrative. The chapters may sound disjointed at times, making you wonder where are you headed. So keep it to ‘Notes’ and if you can add the imagery of being in Peter’s class while he delivers the lecture, you would feel happier. Read this book necessarily for author’s perspective on various things ‘startup’. Here are some of bright spots
Should a startup rather look for a large market or explore a niche instead? Should the founders be similar or different? Is sales necessary even if you have a winner product? Would a 2x improvement be incremental and sufficient or do you need 10x paradigm shift to enter the market? Would you be better disrupting or without it? Do you need a secret for a real startup idea?
I wouldn’t answer in this review but the author does in the book.
There is more. The case studies on renewable energy and Tesla make for an interesting read and so does a matrix plotting optimism-pessimism against definite-indefinite future. He then explores countries and domains on this scale of Definite Optimism, Indefinite optimism et al. There is an interesting comparative of Biotech startups vs Software Startups to draw the contrast on definite v/s indefinite view of future. The investor side of Peter Thiel also talks about VCs , portfolio lifecycle, his own experiences and investment philosophy.
The book is written in simple lucid style and should appeal more to students and those just starting into their own ventures. You may not, like me, take the articulations as gospel truths, but may want to spend more time in thinking, evaluating and experimenting with them.
It is very likely that there is more to Peter Thiel than these 195 pages would indicate. The books leaves you wanting for more. In nutshell, the positive of the book is the perspectives. And for me the bigger let down was it didn’t inspire (now that’s subjective!) But again, I guess it would have been much more a pleasure to hear these lectures live, with the advantage of articulation and aura of struggles and success of Mr. Thiel.
Easy weekend read.
6 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Todd Holscher
3.0 out of 5 stars Simple-minded. Is it satire? Poorly-reasoned? Historically-ignorant? Afraid of competition? IDK
Reviewed in the United States on 13 February 2020
Verified Purchase
This book a fun read but it's also a sad, weak and misguided philosophy.

It is about one "secret" idea: "Monopolies are SECRETLY good!"

That's not really a secret. If YOU OWN THE MONOPOLY you can charge economic rents and increase your income with less risk. Does anyone NOT understand that? Obviously companies like to have monopolies. But that doesn't mean they are a good thing and author's defense of monopolies reads like a satire.

• Is Peter just too young to remember how The Big 3 car company's near-monopoly lead to horrible US cars in the 1970s? Competition with Japan saved the US household thousands of dollars.

• Is he too young to remember how expensive phones were under The Bell Operating Company in the 1970s? Forced competition by breaking into the baby bells opened up billions of savings and new technologies.

• Is he ignorant of the obesity caused by the US Food Pyramid (a government monopoly on dietary guidelines)? Competition from other dietary guidance -- Atkins for one --- is starting to save us billions in obesity-related issues caused by eating too many carbs

• Has he never thought that the competition caused by Walmart's relentless focus on distribution efficiency saves the average US houshold several thousand dollars each year... and that is what enables households to buy the next innovation?

• Hey, and how about the monopolistic expensive cable companies... were that a good thing, Peter? Rember how going wireless saved us billions AND improved connectivity?

Competition in OLD, STAGNANT categories lowers prices... and that saves money to spend on NEW categories and NEW technology.

My advice? Skip the book and read lines 13 & 14 of page 194. I'm paraphrasing;

"if we engage in globalism we will find the pool of competitors is too large. For a breakthrough, new companies, can only succeed if they start with monopoly share of a small market at first. Too much competition is a bad thing."

As a business book, it's mildly entertaining. The idea that you should have the GOAL of building a company that is SO GOOD that it becomes a monopoly... that is a sort of fun way to think about business. But it's a thin treatise for an entire book.

But at the country-level, no monopolies are NOT GOOD. It's as if he thinks the answer is for the US to build a wall to keep everyone from Japan, Germany, Britain, South Korea, China, Sweden and all the other brilliant people from disrupting the monopoly he built. It's sad, it's weak and it reaks of fear.

3-stars for trying.
64 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Rob Galbraith
5.0 out of 5 stars A life-changing read
Reviewed in the United States on 26 February 2020
Verified Purchase
This book has been on my Kindle for years and I had heard great things about it, but never took the time to read it until finishing Alexandra Wolfe's book Valley Of The Gods about the Thiel Fellowship (which is worth a read). I was a bit skeptical owing to Peter Thiel, who is tremendously successful but also a famed contrarian with different political leanings from mine. However, after reading this book, I can say it is one of the top 3 most impactful books I have ever read. As an economics major who has worked in corporate America in the financial services sector for 20+ years, Thiel's description of our economy and society is compelling. His insights into how to create something of true value where nothing previously existed - 0 to 1 - are tremendously valuable, particularly in comparison with most of us who work towards improving what already exists - going from 1 to n. Standard economic theory has been solely tested over the past 25 years with the tech book and Great Financial Crisis as well as globalization and our turbulent times and politics today. Although written in 2014 based on lectures by Thiel at Stanford University in #012, the book remains highly relevant in 2020 and really foreshadows much of what has happened over the last 5 years. Simple, quick and easily accessible, my copy is marked up with tons highlights and notes. You won't regret making the investment in time reading this book, but be prepared to be challenged and bring an open mind to refining your own views, regardless of whether you wholeheartedly agree or disagree with Thiel.
15 people found this helpful
Report abuse
edsetiadi
5.0 out of 5 stars A billionaire’s lecture notes
Reviewed in the United States on 3 June 2022
Verified Purchase
In 2012 venture capitalist Peter Thiel taught a course in his alma matter Stanford about startup, entrepreneurship, and business in general. And among his many students, one in particular, Blake Masters, took very detailed and diligent notes where it then being copied, shared, and became wildly popular among the students.

This book is the polished edition of that concise notes. And it is one of the best business books I’ve ever read.

Thiel’s lessons begin with a simple message: Dominate a small niche and scale up from there. As he explains, “[t]he perfect target market for a startup is a small group of particular people concentrated together and served by few or no competitors.”

Because, it is easier to dominate a small market than a large market already filled with competing companies. Thiel gave the exaggerated example of the cure for baldness or a drug to safely eliminate the need for sleep, to make the point across. But the message is clear: if we build something valuable that never existed before, the increase in value is theoretically limitless.

However, he also throw some cold water over the common believe that great products sell themselves, as plenty of potentially great inventions were born and died without much fanfare. Thiel commented, “[i]f you’ve invented something new but you haven’t invented an effective way to sell it, you have a bad business—no matter how good the product.”

And thus he emphasizes the importance of branding, network effects, utilization of technology, etc, including choosing our market carefully and expanding deliberately within it. Chapter 11 on sales, marketing, and advertising covers this in great detail.

Alternatively, if we cannot come up with something revolutionary, as a start up we can instead radically improve an existing solution. As Thiel remarked, “PayPal, for instance, made buying and selling on eBay at least 10 times better. Instead of mailing a check that would take 7 to 10 days to arrive, PayPal let buyers pay as soon as an auction ended. Sellers received their proceeds right away, and unlike with a check, they knew the funds were good.”

And this book is filled with tactics and examples for these kinds of improvement insights. For example, Thiel mentions about the metrics that he use to set the limits for effective distribution: “The total net profit that you earn on average over the course of your relationship with a customer (Customer Lifetime Value, or CLV) must exceed the amount you spend on average to acquire a new customer (Customer Acquisition Cost, or CAC). In general, the higher the price of your product, the more you have to spend to make a sale—and the more it makes sense to spend it.”

The book then step forward to the next progress in a start up: the importance of careful scaling and expansion. Thiel says that there are 2 forms of progress, vertical and horizontal. Vertical progress means doing completely new things (like what Richard Branson have done multiple times from records to airlines to beverages etc), while horizontal progress involves copying things that work, which is a more natural progression. As Thiel commented “[t]he most successful ecompanies make the core progression—to first dominate a specific niche and then scale to adjacent markets—a part of their founding narrative.”

The best example for this horizontal progression is Amazon, where they showed how it can be masterfully done, from books to CDs to pretty much everything today. Here’s Thiel again: “Jeff Bezos’s founding vision was to dominate all of online retail, but he very deliberately started with books. There were millions of books to catalog, but they all had roughly the same shape, they were easy to ship, and some of the most rarely sold books—those least profitable for any retail store to keep in stock—also drew the most enthusiastic customers.”

Moreover, in the book Thiel also writes about his experience as an investor looking at businesses from the outside perspective, with special mention of the pareto principle, where roughly 20% of successful investments (or start-up attempts) will outperform the 80% of flops and still leave us with a net gain, sometimes even a big one. He provides a compelling argument using many examples to show the principle at work, which is nothing short of an epiphany for me. The message from him is again simple: in the end it’s about the batting average, not the once (or few) in a lifetime home runs. And this also applies in many other walks of life.

I could really go on and on about the wide range of topics in this dense book, which also teaches us about disruptions, luck, definite and indefinite views of the future. It tells us about when to fight with all we got, when to step back, or when to merge (if you can’t beat them, join them). And ultimately, it provides us with the day-to-day framework to efficiently run a business, which was the main reason why my entrepreneur friend highly recommended this book to me in the first place.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Herve Lebret
5.0 out of 5 stars Thiel has more wise things to teach you than just crazy though brilliant visions.
Reviewed in the United States on 2 June 2015
Verified Purchase
I have been reading Thiel‘s Zero to One in the last days. And after a compilation of his class notes last year, here are a few more comments. His book is as good as his notes but some readers may be puzzled. It’s not a book about how to build start-ups. (For this read Horowitz or Blank) “This book offers no formula for success. The paradox of teaching entrepreneurship is that such a formula necessarily cannot exist; because every innovation is new and unique, no authority can prescribe in concrete terms how to be innovative. Indeed, the single most powerful pattern I have noticed is that successful people find value in unexpected places, and they do this by thinking about business from first principles instead of formulas.” [Page 2]

Thiel is a strong believer in exceptional achievements, in innovation just like in art or science. “The entrepreneurs who stuck with Silicon Valley learned four big lessons from the dot-com crash that still guide business thinking today:
1. Make incremental advances
2. Stay lean and flexible
3. Improve on the competition
4. Focus on products, not sales.
These lessons have become dogma in the startup world. (…) And yet the opposite principles are probably more correct:
1. It is better to risk boldness than trivaility
2. A bad plan is better than no plan
3. Competitive markets destroy profits
4. Sales matters just as much as product.“
[Pages 20-21]

There is one point where I disagree with Thiel. Though I tend to be convinced by his argument that monopoly is good and competition is bad – read Thiel with care for the subtlety of his arguments – I do not think he is right when he writes [page 33]: “Monopolies drive progress because the promise of years or even decades of monopoly profits provides a powerful incentive to innovate”. I prefer Levine and Boldrin. Now I do believe that established players are displaced by new players – not competitors – who innovate when the champions who have become dinosaurs stop being creative.

Thiel does not believe in luck. “You are not a lottery ticket” and I agree that you can minimize uncertainty by carefully planning and probably by adapting too. He still quotes [page 59] Buffett who considers himself “a member of the lucky sperm club and a winner of the ovarian lottery”. He also quotes Bezos with his “incredible planetary alignment” (which has not much to do with luck either). According to Thiel. success is never accidental.

I also like his piece about founders: “Bad decisions made early on – if you choose the wrong partners or hire the wrong people, for example – are very hard to correct after they are made. It may take a crisis on the order of bankruptcy before anybody will even try to correct them. As a founder your first job is to get the first things right, because you cannot build a great company on a flawed foundation. When you start something, the first and most crucial decision you make is whom to start it with. Choosing a co-founder is like getting married, and founder conflict is just as ugly as divorce. Optimism abounds at the start of every relationship. It’s unromantic to think soberly about what could go wrong, so people don’t. But if the founders develop irreconcilable differences, the company becomes the victim.” [page 108]

Ands now about sales: “In engineering a solution either works or fails. [Sales is different]. This strikes engineers as trivial if not fundamentally dishonest. They know they own jobs are hard so when they look at salespeople laughing on the phone with a customer or going to two-hour lunches, they suspect that no real work is being done. If anything, people overestimate the relative difficulty of science and engineering, because the challenges of those fields are obvious. What nerds miss is that it takes hard work to makes sales look easy. Sales is hidden. All salesmen are actors: their priority is persuasion, not sincerity. That’s why the word “salesman” can be a slur and the used car dealer is our archetype of shadiness. But we react negatively to awkward, obvious salesmen – that is, the bad ones. There’s a wide range of sales ability: there are many gradations between novices, experts and masters. […] Like acting, sales works best when hidden. This explains why almost everyone whose job involves distribution – whether they’re in sales, marketing, or advertising – has a job title that has nothing to do with those things: account executive, bus. dev, but also investment banker, politician. There’s a reason for these re-descriptions: none of us wants to be reminded when we’re being sold. […] The engineer’s grail is a product great enough that “it sells itself”. But anyone who would actually say this about a real product must be lying: either he’s delusional (lying to himself) or he’s selling something (and thereby contradicting himself). […] It’s better to think of distribution as something essential to the design of your product. If you’ve invented something new but you haven’t invented an effective way to sell it, you have a bad business – no matter how good the product.” [Pages 128-130] And if you do not like it said this way, watch HBO’s Silicon Valley episode 15… I may come with more comments when I am finished with this great book.

In fact I have... and here are a few more comments, less about entrepreneurship than about social issues. Whatever the reputation of Thiel in Silicon Valley as a possible Libertarian, there were a couple of topics he addresses very convincingly. He is not a pure Contrarian. He disagrees with mainstream fashion in a very serious manner. Here are a couple of examples:

– The machine will not replace humankind
Yes computers have made impressive progress in the recent decades, but not to the point of replacing mankind. He shows very convincingly through the cases of Paypal and Palantir [pages 144-148] that computers cannot solve automatically tough issues but are only (excellent and critical) complements to human beings. Even the Google experiment of recognizing cats “seems impressive – until you remember that an average four-year-old can do it flawlessly” [page 143]. He finishes his chapter about Man and Machine this way: “But even if strong AI is a real possibility rather than an imponderable mystery, it won’t happen anytime soon: replacement by computers is a worry for the 22nd century. Indefinite fears about the far future shouldn’t stop us from making definite plans today. Luddites claim that we shouldn’t build the computers that might replace people someday; crazed futurists argue that we should. These two positions are mutually exclusive but they are not exhaustive: there is room in between for sane people to build a vastly better world in the decades ahead. As we find new ways to use computers, they won’t just get better at the kinds of things people already do: they’ll help us to do what was previously unimaginable” [pages 150-151]. You will not be surprised I prefer this to Kurweil views.

– Greentech was a bubble and it was obvious from day 1.
I was always puzzled with greentech/cleantech. Why are people so excited about the promise to solve an important problem when we do not have any solution. Thiel is far tougher. First he shows the obvious: it was a bubble. Then he analyzes this industry through his “zero to one” arguments.
“Most cleantech companies crashed because they neglected one or more of the seven questions that every business must answer:
– Engineering: can you create a breakthrough technology instead of incremental improvements?
– Timing: is now the right time to start your particular business?
– Monopoly: are you starting with a big share of a small market?
– People: do you have the right team?
– Distribution: do you have a way to not just create but deliver your product?
– Durability: will your market position be defensible 10 and 20 years into the future?
– Secret: have you identified a unique opportunity that others don’t see?
If you do not have answers to these questions, you’ll run into lots of “bad luck” and your business will fail. If you nail all seven, you’ll master fortune and succeed. Even getting five or six correct might work. But the striking thing about the cleantech bubble was that people were starting companies with zero good answers – and that meant hoping for a miracle” [page 154]. What’s next? Fintech?
8 people found this helpful
Report abuse
  • ←Previous
  • Next page→
Need customer service? Click here
‹ See all details for Zero to One: Notes on Start Ups, or How to Build the Future

Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations
›
View or edit your browsing history
After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.

Back to top
Get to Know Us
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Corporate Information
  • Press Releases
  • Amazon Science
Make Money with Us
  • Independently Publish with Us
  • Sell on Amazon
  • Drive with Amazon Flex
  • Advertise Your Products
  • Associates Program
  • Host an Amazon Hub
Let Us Help You
  • COVID-19 and Amazon
  • Your Account
  • Your Orders
  • Delivery Rates & Policies
  • Returns & Replacements
  • Manage Your Content and Devices
  • Help
  • Brazil
  • Canada
  • China
  • France
  • Germany
  • India
  • Italy
  • Japan
  • Mexico
  • Netherlands
  • Poland
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Turkey
  • United Arab Emirates
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
And don't forget:
  • Amazon Advertising
  • Amazon Web Services
  • Goodreads
  • Shopbop
  • Conditions of Use & Sale
  • Privacy Notice
  • Interest-Based Ads Notice
© 1996-2022, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates