Amazon.com.au:Customer reviews: Napoleon the Great
Skip to main content
.com.au
Hello Select your address
All
Select the department you want to search in
Hello, Sign in
Account & Lists
Returns & Orders
Cart
All
Best Sellers Customer Service Prime Today's Deals Fashion Music Books New Releases Kindle Books Electronics Home Gift Cards Toys & Games Computers Audible Video Games Beauty Sports, Fitness & Outdoors Gift Ideas Home Improvement Health & Personal Care Pet Supplies Automotive Coupons Subscribe and save Sell
Meet Alexa

  • Napoleon the Great
  • ›
  • Customer reviews

Customer reviews

4.7 out of 5 stars
4.7 out of 5
705 global ratings
5 star
77%
4 star
18%
3 star
3%
2 star
1%
1 star
1%
Napoleon the Great

Napoleon the Great

byAndrew Roberts
Write a review
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
See All Buying Options

Top positive review

All positive reviews›
Christopher
5.0 out of 5 starsBest history of Napoleon I have read
Reviewed in Australia on 13 July 2020
Concise, well researched, brimming with quotes of letters and actual events. Unlike many other 'opinion' pieces. Andrews supports his statements with extensive reliance on contemporary correspondence. He also discusses previous scholarly writings, so you can make up your own mind.

Best of all, a rollicking good read. Highly recommended. One of the best history biographies I have read.
Read more
One person found this helpful

Top critical review

All critical reviews›
Mark J Skinner
1.0 out of 5 starsThe great hagiography
Reviewed in Australia on 17 June 2015
The journey from Thatcherite lap dog now leaves us with a great hagiography. I can't understand why Roberts has elected to write this piece of overlong praise of Napoleon. rTomorrow the 18th of June is the 200th anniversary of the battle of Waterloo, the final defeat of Napoleon I by combined English and Prussian forces under the command of Arthur Wellesley ,Duke of Wellington in what is now Belgium. The historiography of Mr Bonaparte seems to swing between naïve adulation and bitter condemnation. Roberts is with the former. Bonaparte came from a family of Corsican bandits and behaved like one all his life, with a certain grandeur added to the mix as he secured more titles, armies, women, countries and bullion for himself and his ungrateful and equally obnoxious family. We are in the midst of an odd period where a number of historians are singing his praises as both general and statesman; notably the Thatcherite booster Andrew Roberts who has produced a new paean recently. What is his record? After railroading the late French Revolution, he caused massive devastation throughout Europe and Russia with millions of deaths. He attempted to conquer and resettle Europe with himself as dictator - being crowned Emperor, in mock Roman style, if ‘style’ is the word. All his strategic goals failed from Portugal to Moscow and across the high seas. His wars fought with some tactical skill achieved nothing lasting but death and destruction. He established a new legal code, far inferior to common law and subject to the sort of military adventurism with which he had lived his life. Our Friends the French still admire him and a trip to Les Invalides where he is buried in grandeur causes one to wonder at the sanity of the French. Finally at Waterloo, Europe was saved from the little tyrant by an army of Englishman described famously by Wellington as ‘the scum of the earth” and an army of Prussian professionals. Napoleon himself stated on the morning of the battle “I tell you Wellington is a bad general, the English are bad troops, and this affair is nothing more than eating breakfast". As we know this proved to be foolish. The French are hoping that there is not too much jingoism around the commerations. But for us, remembering Waterloo is to be welcomed. In history, only Hitler and Bonaparte threatened the liberties of Europe in such dangerous ways. avoid this work
Read more
4 people found this helpful

Search
Sort by
Top reviews
Filter by
All reviewers
All stars
Text, image, video
705 global ratings | 296 global reviews

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

From Australia

Christopher
5.0 out of 5 stars Best history of Napoleon I have read
Reviewed in Australia on 13 July 2020
Verified Purchase
Concise, well researched, brimming with quotes of letters and actual events. Unlike many other 'opinion' pieces. Andrews supports his statements with extensive reliance on contemporary correspondence. He also discusses previous scholarly writings, so you can make up your own mind.

Best of all, a rollicking good read. Highly recommended. One of the best history biographies I have read.
One person found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Lindsay Sheehan
4.0 out of 5 stars Very thorough book
Reviewed in Australia on 17 October 2020
Verified Purchase
Was a great book, I knew nothing about Napoleon and found the book easy to follow for the most part.
Very well written.
One person found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Thomas Brough
5.0 out of 5 stars Definitive history
Reviewed in Australia on 22 June 2018
Verified Purchase
Detailed, nuanced, even handed and thorough. Hard to put down until the retreat from Moscow had happened and inevitable fall from grace approached.
One person found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Guy b
5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
Reviewed in Australia on 24 January 2015
Verified Purchase
Thoroughly enjoyed reading this enthralling book .
One person found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Andrew O'Keeffe
5.0 out of 5 stars Super Book
Reviewed in Australia on 7 December 2018
An enthralling book, both from quality of the research, the engaging writing and the character involved (Napoleon). I am so pleased I read this book. It was hard to put down and I highly recommend it
One person found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Mark J Skinner
1.0 out of 5 stars The great hagiography
Reviewed in Australia on 17 June 2015
The journey from Thatcherite lap dog now leaves us with a great hagiography. I can't understand why Roberts has elected to write this piece of overlong praise of Napoleon. rTomorrow the 18th of June is the 200th anniversary of the battle of Waterloo, the final defeat of Napoleon I by combined English and Prussian forces under the command of Arthur Wellesley ,Duke of Wellington in what is now Belgium. The historiography of Mr Bonaparte seems to swing between naïve adulation and bitter condemnation. Roberts is with the former. Bonaparte came from a family of Corsican bandits and behaved like one all his life, with a certain grandeur added to the mix as he secured more titles, armies, women, countries and bullion for himself and his ungrateful and equally obnoxious family. We are in the midst of an odd period where a number of historians are singing his praises as both general and statesman; notably the Thatcherite booster Andrew Roberts who has produced a new paean recently. What is his record? After railroading the late French Revolution, he caused massive devastation throughout Europe and Russia with millions of deaths. He attempted to conquer and resettle Europe with himself as dictator - being crowned Emperor, in mock Roman style, if ‘style’ is the word. All his strategic goals failed from Portugal to Moscow and across the high seas. His wars fought with some tactical skill achieved nothing lasting but death and destruction. He established a new legal code, far inferior to common law and subject to the sort of military adventurism with which he had lived his life. Our Friends the French still admire him and a trip to Les Invalides where he is buried in grandeur causes one to wonder at the sanity of the French. Finally at Waterloo, Europe was saved from the little tyrant by an army of Englishman described famously by Wellington as ‘the scum of the earth” and an army of Prussian professionals. Napoleon himself stated on the morning of the battle “I tell you Wellington is a bad general, the English are bad troops, and this affair is nothing more than eating breakfast". As we know this proved to be foolish. The French are hoping that there is not too much jingoism around the commerations. But for us, remembering Waterloo is to be welcomed. In history, only Hitler and Bonaparte threatened the liberties of Europe in such dangerous ways. avoid this work
4 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


From other countries

David Beeson
5.0 out of 5 stars Balanced, well-rounded, invaluable
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 2 June 2018
Verified Purchase
It was a Frenchman who recommended to me that I read Andrew Roberts’ 'Napoleon the Great'. He was impressed by the balance and impartiality that a British biographer had brought to his study of a man still too often seen as a kind of mythical hero in France, but as a monster in Britain.

It’s certainly an excellent antidote to that kind of thinking, and one I personally needed, as I’ve tended to share the view of Napoleon as a military dictator whose overthrow was much to be desired. That’s not to say that the figure that emerges from Roberts’ account is not still a military dictator. Indeed, in his ‘Conclusion’ Roberts makes clear that Napoleon was first and last a military man:

'… it was from the ethos of the army that he took most of his beliefs and his assumptions. The army imbued him with a strong belief in the importance of applied intelligence, hierarchy based on merit, law and order, hard work, mental toughness and physical courage, as well as contempt for self-serving lawyers and politicians.'

What’s more, what he overthrew in his military coup was indeed a cabal of self-serving lawyers and politicians, by no means the ideal of a democratic republic that we all might admire. And while in general terms, I can find little to like about a military dictatorship, there is much to be said for ‘applied intelligence, hierarchy based on merit, law and order, hard work’. Roberts shows that Napoleon strove hard to create a France imbued with these values.

Indeed, as he points out, many of Napoleon’s achievements in these fields have lived on in a way his purely military successes have not. Most notably, this is true of the foundations of law both in France (the <i>code Napoléon</i>) and in other countries whose constitution he profoundly transformed. Promotion on merit, except when it came to putting family members into positions of power, often far beyond their abilities, was a principle he sought to establish and, as an aspiration at least, it lives on strongly today. Moreover, he did away with the privileges of classes to move towards a system based on equality before the law.

And Roberts describes Napoleon’s extraordinary capacity for hard work, revealed even in such simple measures as the sheer number of letters he wrote, or his capacity to issue instructions about such matters as the musical performances in Paris while on the eve of a major battle.

Nor, as Roberts makes clear repeatedly, was he a tyrant. He allowed a certain level of dissent and, while he moved against opponents who became too threatening, with rare exceptions he stopped far short of persecuting, let alone murdering them. Indeed, the nations that banded together to defeat him, were far crueller and far more iniquitous than he ever was. With the possible exception of Britain, where parliamentary rule was strong, allowing the potential at least of a slow move towards some measure of democracy, the major powers arrayed against him – Austria, Russia and Prussia – were such that his regime, with all its faults, seemed deeply preferable.

Roberts hasn’t, however, written a hagiography. He doesn’t disguise the many faults of his subject: the vainglory, the nepotism, for instance, but also the occasions when he did drift close towards tyrannical behaviour (such as in the murder of the Duc d’Enghien, as brutal as it was unnecessary), or the errors of judgement that he frequently made. For instance, he failed to see that militarily many of his enemies had learned from his own innovations, so that towards the end of his career they were ready for the kind of brilliant strokes that had won him victories in the past.

Worse still, he often overestimated his own strength and capacity, most notably in the invasion of Russia. It cost him both his prestige and his most reliable forces (he took 500,000 men into Russia and brought only 50,000 out). That loss made his ultimate downfall inevitable.

Roberts provides an excellent, detailed and well-rounded picture of an extraordinary man, just as my French friend promised. Anyone interested in Napoleon and his period would do well to read this biography. You won’t be disappointed, either by the writing, or by the lessons it teaches.
81 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Leopold
5.0 out of 5 stars HISTORICAL TOUR DE FORCE
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 30 April 2018
Verified Purchase
There have been hundreds, probably thousands of books on Napoleon, but Andrew Roberts has produced a riveting, fluent history of Napoleon’s rise and fall that must rank with the very best of them.

He takes us at an easy canter through Napoleon’s “petite noblesse” upbringing in Corsica under his formidable mother, to his studies at the Brienne Military Academy and his early career in the army during the dark days of the French Revolution and the Terror that followed.

I sensed that the author became ever more an admirer of Napoleon’s achievements, military and political, as he wrote this story of his
extraordinary life. There is no arguing with their fact that Napoleon was as Wellington admitted, a military genius to rank with Alexander and Caesar, so as deserving of the epithet
“Great”, while his political and administrative achievements remain part of European life two hundred years after his death.

While Roberts takes us through all the famous victories; Austerlitz, Jena, Wagram, Friedland as well as the disasters of Russia and Waterloo he always reminds us that Napoleon was at the same time planning a reformed, enlightened Europe- under French
suzerainty, naturally. He also makes the more controversial but interesting case that had Napoleon not over-reached himself, with his defeat leading to European monarchies protecting their divine rights, Europe may have been spared the reforming convulsions of the nineteenth century which led to the horrors of the First and Second Wars. Discuss...

In this sympathetic biography what I found most surprising was that Napoleon was by all contemporary accounts a warm, amusing and sympathetic man, as well as a genius. His troops loved him, his wives and mistresses adored him and the account of his companiable friendship with the fourteen- year old daughter of the English family he lodged with on his arrival at St. Helena is touching - an Emperor who ruled Europe playing whist and blindman’s buff.

Napoleon’s wars cost three million European lives; how then can I still feel admiration and sympathy for a man I was brought up to think of as ‘the ogre- Boney’?

I defy anyone who reads this utterly compelling book not to share at least some of that admiration and sympathy.
28 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Richard Ellis
5.0 out of 5 stars A magnificent, rounded biography
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 9 June 2019
Verified Purchase
I read my first biography of Napoleon (Felix Markham's) back in 1965, and have read dozens more books on him since. This is the best I've read. It is distinguished by drawing on a study of Napoleon's 33,000 letters (published by the Fondation Napoléon in 2004, a third of which have never been published before) and an impressive array of primary and secondary sources. Alongside this, Roberts has visited all but 7 of Napoleon's 60 battlefields in the company of military experts, and key locations throughout Napoleon's life including Elba, the Route Napoléon and St Helena. It is an enthralling and insightful read, his command of the correspondence enabling him to illustrate the great man's protean mind as he juggled the immediacies of campaigns and battles with the minutiae of matters across an extraordinary range of subjects back home. The character studies of those around him are vivid.

In his conclusion (the penultimate chapter, the final one "Envoi" being a sentence or two on what happened to all the other leading characters in the story after Napoleon's death) Roberts sums up his life and career, and sets out to justify his choice of title, which he does convincingly. Roberts makes a powerful case for Napoleon's powers as a civil administrator who shaped much of what is great about France today. He could perhaps have made more of Napoleon's wish not to bring destruction on French soil by fighting on in 1814 and 15 as compared with his cavalier attitude to causing carnage abroad, but there we are - a life like Napoleon's is likely to be rich in contradictions.

The book is generously illustrated with 86 illustrations crammed into 24 colour plates. There are 29 maps, perhaps the least satisfactory aspect of the book as they don't always relate to the text in the most helpful way (places and features mentioned which don't appear on the map) and I've seen better battlefield maps, which don't do justice to Roberts's vivid descriptions. But these are always a challenge as the dispositions on the battlefield can change radically during the battle. A sloppy proof reading error (in the Penguin edition, presumably copied from the original hardback) on the map showing the movement of the Grande Armée from the Channel coast to the Rhine August-October 1805, prior to Austerlitz, says "1803" in the heading, which may confuse some people. One myth dispelled - it has always been said that when Napoleon gave the order to his gunners to fire on the ice across which the Russians were fleeing at Austerlitz that thousands of Russians were drowned, but Roberts tells us that recent excavations of reclaimed land at the lake have come up with only a dozen corpses and a couple of guns.
9 people found this helpful
Report abuse
E D Floyd
5.0 out of 5 stars A TOUR DE FORCE
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 25 August 2018
Verified Purchase
This remarkable work tells us about the Napoleon's character as well as the legend (which it corrects). Napoleon was a truly extraordinary and many faceted character and a great man who has left a lasting impact on History. This biography is a truly remarkable work by Andrew Roberts. The scale of his research is amazing, as is the way Napoleon's military and political worlds are associated so closely with his personal life. The scale of the Allied opposition and continual challenges that Napoleon faced are highlighted. In my opinion this work takes Biography to a new level . We owe so much to Andrew's insight based upon his extraordinary diligence. David
9 people found this helpful
Report abuse
  • ←Previous
  • Next page→
Need customer service? Click here
‹ See all details for Napoleon the Great

Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations
›
View or edit your browsing history
After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.

Back to top
Get to Know Us
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Corporate Information
  • Press Releases
  • Amazon Science
Make Money with Us
  • Independently Publish with Us
  • Sell on Amazon
  • Drive with Amazon Flex
  • Advertise Your Products
  • Associates Program
  • Host an Amazon Hub
Let Us Help You
  • COVID-19 and Amazon
  • Your Account
  • Your Orders
  • Delivery Rates & Policies
  • Returns & Replacements
  • Manage Your Content and Devices
  • Help
  • Brazil
  • Canada
  • China
  • France
  • Germany
  • India
  • Italy
  • Japan
  • Mexico
  • Netherlands
  • Poland
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Turkey
  • United Arab Emirates
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
And don't forget:
  • Amazon Advertising
  • Amazon Web Services
  • Goodreads
  • Shopbop
  • Conditions of Use & Sale
  • Privacy Notice
  • Interest-Based Ads Notice
© 1996-2022, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates